이 논문에서는 미국의 손실보상기준을 이주대책과 기타 생활재건조치를 중심으로 고찰하고, 이를 우리나라의 손실보상기준과 비교법적으로 검토함으로써 시사점을 도출함을 목적으로 하고 있다. 미국에서는 공익사업을 위한 용지를 취득하는 경우 Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Act of 1970이 보상기준으로 적용된다. 이 법은 주로 이주대책과 기타의 생활재건조치에 관한 사항을 규정하고 있으며, 이러한 생활재건조치는 헌법상의 정당보상(just compensation)이 아닌 행정상의 조치로 설명되고 있다. 이주대책은 크게 개인에 대한 이전재건급부와 영업자등에 대한 이전재건급부로 구분되며, 개인에 대한 이전재건급부는 동산의 이전비, 주택취득을 위한 추가비용의 급부, 대체주택의 제공이 있고, 영업자등에 대한 이전급부는 실액보상과 정액보상이 있다. 그 밖의 생활재건조치로 이전재건지원서비스가 있다.우리나라의 손실보상기준 특히 이주대책과 생활재건조치와 비교해보면, 영업보상에 관한 규정이 없는 등 대체로 우리나라의 손실보상기준이 권리보호에 충실하다고 보여진다. 그러나 미국의 손실보상기준에는 ① 개별적인 특수사정을 고려하도록 하고, ② 동산이전비 보상이 사후보상의 성격을 가지며, ③ 저소득자를 위한 주택제공이 이루어지고, ④ 이전재건상담원제도를 두어 생활재건상의 서비스를 받을 수 있도록 지원하고 있다는 점에서 우리나라에 시사하는 바가 크다고 할 수 있다.

This study are focused on examining compensation criterion for a rehabilitation of living loss and a countermeasure to move a settlement in America, aiming to give comparative suggestions to compensation criterions between Korea and America. When land is expropriated for the public works in America, Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Act of 1970 works for compensation criterion. It includes regulations of a countermeasure to move a settlement and a rehabilitation of living loss which is regards as not just compensation in Constitution but administrative measure. The countermeasure to move a settlement is divided in personal and business. Personal countermeasure be liable for moving costs of movable estate, extra cost of purchasing housing, and alternative housing. Business countermeasure includes compensation for actual and fixed amount of business loss. In addition, there are services for support expropriated persons to move a settlement. When Korean compensation criterion is compared with American, it seems like to guarantee faithfully personal property. But It is recommendable that American compensation criterion include considering personal distinctiveness, paying actual expense in moving movable property, supplying affordable housing, and operating counselling agent system for rehabilitation of living loss.

This study are focused on examining compensation criterion for a rehabilitation of living loss and a countermeasure to move a settlement in America, aiming to give comparative suggestions to compensation criterions between Korea and America. When land is expropriated for the public works in America, Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Act of 1970 works for compensation criterion. It includes regulations of a countermeasure to move a settlement and a rehabilitation of living loss which is regards as not just compensation in Constitution but administrative measure. The countermeasure to move a settlement is divided in personal and business. Personal countermeasure be liable for moving costs of movable estate, extra cost of purchasing housing, and alternative housing. Business countermeasure includes compensation for actual and fixed amount of business loss. In addition, there are services for support expropriated persons to move a settlement. When Korean compensation criterion is compared with American, it seems like to guarantee faithfully personal property. But It is recommendable that American compensation criterion include considering personal distinctiveness, paying actual expense in moving movable property, supplying affordable housing, and operating counselling agent system for rehabilitation of living loss.

compensation criterion, rehabilitation, countermeasure to move a settlement